Search for Author, Title, Keyword
RESEARCH PAPER
Condition-Based Maintenance of Traction Motor Cooling Fans in EMUs: Case Study and Implementation Challenges
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Railway Transport, Poznań University of Technology, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2025-12-30
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-03-05
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-03-23
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-04-02
 
 
Corresponding author
Tomasz Nowakowski   

Department of Railway Transport, Poznań University of Technology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie 5, 60-965, Poznan, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The transition from Time-Based Maintenance (TBM) to Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) remains a challenge for the railway sector due to stringent safety regulations. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a framework for diagnostic monitoring of traction motor cooling fans in Electric Multiple Units. Using vibration analysis and adaptive statistical thresholds, the study demonstrates increased sensitivity compared to ISO 10816-3 limits. Research on 42 fans revealed that the proposed method achieved a 92.9% agreement with normative classifications while identifying early-stage degradations. A crucial part of the study is the formal analysis of change significance in accordance with the 402/2013 (CSM RA) regulation, providing a systematic approach to managing safety risks during technology implementation. The article provides a practical roadmap for integrating this 19-minute procedure into routine light maintenance, offering a scalable solution to overcome formal and technical barriers in adopting predictive maintenance for safety-critical systems.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Coleman C, Damodaran S, Chandramouli M, Deuel E. Making maintenance smarter. Predictive maintenance and the digital supply network. A Deloitte Series on Digital Manufacturing Enterprise 2017: 21.
 
2.
Wardahni N I, Latief Y. Railway Infrastructures E-Maintenance Systems: A Literature Review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2024; 1324 :012045, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1....
 
3.
Verhagen W J C, Santos B F, Freeman F, van Kessel P, Zarouchas D, Loutas T, Yeun R C K, Heiets I. Condition-Based Maintenance in Aviation: Challenges and Opportunities. Aerospace 2023; 10(9): 762, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerosp....
 
4.
Kabashkin I, Perekrestov V. Ecosystem of Aviation Maintenance: Transition from Aircraft Health Monitoring to Health Management Based on IoT and AI Synergy. Applied Sciences 2024; 14(11): 4394, https://doi.org/10.3390/app141....
 
5.
Abbasi T, Lim KH, Ahmed Soomro T, Ismail I, Ali A. Condition Based Maintenance of Oil and Gas Equipment: A Review. 2020 3rd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET 2020), IEEE; 2020, p. 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1109/iCoMET....
 
6.
Marti-Puig P, Touhami I A, Perarnau R C, Serra-Serra M. Industrial A I in condition-based maintenance: A case study in wooden piece manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering 2024; 188: 109907, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.....
 
7.
European Union. Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the interoperability of the rail system within the European Union (recast). European Union: Official Journal of the European Union, L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 44–101; 2016.
 
8.
European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/779 of 16 May 2019 establishing a system of certification of entities in charge of maintenance for vehicles pursuant to Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council. European Union: Official Journal of the European Union, L 139, 27.5.2019, p. 360–401; 2019.
 
9.
European Union. Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (recast). European Union: Official Journal of the European Union, L 138, 26.5.2016, p. 102–149; 2016.
 
10.
European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment. European Union: Official Journal of the European Union; 2013.
 
11.
Fumeo E, Oneto L, Anguita D. Condition based maintenance in railway transportation systems based on big data streaming analysis. Procedia Computer Science 2015; 53: 437–446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proc....
 
12.
Do P, Voisin A, Levrat E, Iung B. A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2015; 133: 22–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
13.
Alaswad S, Xiang Y. A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2017; 157: 54–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
14.
Moxa Company. Moxa Enables Onboard Data Processing of Condition Monitoring to Improve Train Maintenance. Railway International 2023, https://railway-international.... (accessed June 20, 2025).
 
15.
Bougacha O, Varnier C, Zerhouni N. Impact of decision horizon on post-prognostics maintenance and missions scheduling: a railways case study. International Journal of Rail Transportation 2022; 10: 516–546, https://doi.org/10.1080/232483....
 
16.
Andersen J F, Nielsen B F. A comparative study of time-based maintenance and condition-based maintenance for multi-component systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2025; 256, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
17.
Niu G, Jiang J. Prognostic control-enhanced maintenance optimization for multi-component systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2017; 168: 218–226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
18.
Compare M, Antonello F, Pinciroli L, Zio E. A general model for life-cycle cost analysis of Condition-Based Maintenance enabled by PHM capabilities. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2022; 224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
19.
Asplund M, Famurewa S, Rantatalo M. Condition monitoring and e-maintenance solution of railway wheels. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2014; 20: 216–232, https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-0....
 
20.
Ye Y, Li H, Wang Q, Li F, Yi C, Peng X, Huang C, Zeng J. Fault diagnosis of railway wheelsets: A review. Measurement 2025; 242: 116169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
21.
Mohammadi M, Mosleh A, Vale C, Ribeiro D, Montenegro P, Meixedo A. Smart railways: AI-based track-side monitoring for wheel flat identification. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 2025; 239: 272–289, https://doi.org/10.1177/095440....
 
22.
Nowakowski T, Tomaszewski F, Komorski P, Szymański GM. Tram gearbox condition monitoring method based on trackside acoustic measurement. Measurement 2023; 207: 112358, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
23.
Zhang B, Tan ACC, Lin J hui. Gearbox fault diagnosis of high-speed railway train. Engineering Failure Analysis 2016; 66: 407–420, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engf....
 
24.
Wolf M, Rudolph M, Kanoun O. Amplitude and frequency estimator for aperiodic multi-frequency noisy vibration signals of a tram gearbox. Journal of Vibroengineering 2021; 23: 1492–1507, https://doi.org/10.21595/JVE.2....
 
25.
Doyle S, Vale T, Bastucescu C. Pantograph condition monitoring system for automated maintenance inspections and prevention of overhead wiring tear downs. Conference on Railway Excellence CORE2016, Melbourne: Maintaining the Momentum RTSA; 2016, p. 10.
 
26.
Zhang D, Entezami M, Stewart E, Roberts C, Yu D. Adaptive fault feature extraction from wayside acoustic signals from train bearings. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2018; 425: 221–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.....
 
27.
Wabtec Corporation. RailBAM – Bearing Acoustic Monitor, https://www.wabteccorp.com/dig... (accessed July 16, 2025).
 
28.
Zhang D, Entezami M, Stewart E, Roberts C, Yu D. A novel Doppler Effect reduction method for wayside acoustic train bearing fault detection systems. Applied Acoustics 2019; 145: 112–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apac....
 
29.
Voestalpine. Zentrak – Rolling Stock Monitoring, www.voestalpine.com/railway-systems (accessed July 16, 2025).
 
30.
Komorski P, Kominowski J, Motyl M. A proposal for a mobile system of vehicle and rail track diagnostics. Transport Problems 2022; 17: 45–56, https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.20....
 
31.
Sawczuk W, Merkisz-Guranowska A, Rilo Cañás A-M, Kołodziejski S. New approach to brake pad wear modelling based on test stand friction-mechanical investigations. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2022; 24: 419–426, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
 
32.
Shaikh M Z, Ahmed Z, Chowdhry B S, Baro E N, Hussain T, Uqaili MA, Mehran S, Kumar D, Shah A A. State-of-the-Art Wayside Condition Monitoring Systems for Railway Wheels: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Access 2023; 11: 13257–13279, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS....
 
33.
Smoczyński P, Gill A, Kadziński A. Maintenance layers for railway infrastructure in Poland. Transport 2021; 35: 605–615, https://doi.org/10.3846/transp....
 
34.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 20816 Mechanical vibration — Measurement and evaluation of machine vibration. International: 2016.
 
35.
Cempel C. Limit value in the practice of machine vibration diagnostics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 1990; 4: 483–493, https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-3....
 
36.
Nowakowski T, Komorski P. Diagnostics of the drive shaft bearing based on vibrations in the high-frequency range as a part of the vehicle’s self-diagnostic system. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2021; 24: 70–79, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
 
37.
Cempel C. Vibroacoustic condition monitoring (Ellis Horwood Series in Mechanical Engineering). Warsaw: Ellis Horwood; 1993.
 
38.
The PREDICT-MAINTENANCE project. UIC Project Information, https://uic.org/projects-99/ar... (accessed December 19, 2025).
 
39.
UIC High Speed Members. Report: Necessities for future high speed rolling stock. 2010.
 
40.
Catelani M, Ciani L, Galar D, Guidi G, Matucci S, Patrizi G. FMECA Assessment for Railway Safety-Critical Systems Investigating a New Risk Threshold Method. IEEE Access 2021; 9: 86243–86253, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS....
 
41.
Dinmohammadi F, Alkali B, Shafiee M, Bérenguer C, Labib A. Risk Evaluation of Railway Rolling Stock Failures Using FMECA Technique: A Case Study of Passenger Door System. Urban Rail Transit 2016; 2: 128–145, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40864....
 
42.
Zhang W-H, Qin J, Lu D-G, Liu M, Faber M H. Quantification of the value of condition monitoring system with time-varying monitoring performance in the context of risk-based inspection. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2023; 231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
43.
Raczyński J. Life cycle cost as a criterion in purchase of rolling stock. MATEC Web of Conferences 2018; 180: 02010, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecc....
 
44.
García Márquez FP, Lewis R W, Tobias A M, Roberts C. Life cycle costs for railway condition monitoring. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 2008; 44: 1175–1187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.....
 
45.
Silmon J A, Roberts C. Improving railway switch system reliability with innovative condition monitoring algorithms. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 2010; 224: 293–302, https://doi.org/10.1243/095440....
 
46.
Grall A, Bérenguer C, Dieulle L. A condition-based maintenance policy for stochastically deteriorating systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2002; 76: 167–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-....
 
eISSN:2956-3860
ISSN:1507-2711
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top