Search for Author, Title, Keyword
RESEARCH PAPER
Prediction of machine state for non-Gaussian degradation model using Hidden Markov Model approach
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
 
2
Faculty of Geoengineering Mining and Geology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland
 
3
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University, Kraków, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2024-06-14
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-08-12
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-09-29
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-10-07
 
 
Publication date: 2024-10-07
 
 
Corresponding author
Joanna Janczura   

Faculty of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland
 
 
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2025;27(1):193898
 
HIGHLIGHTS
  • On-line prediction method for forthcoming machine state is proposed.
  • Degradation model with three machine states (healthy, warning and alarm) is used.
  • α-stable HMM method is developed for non- Gaussian (impulsive) HI data.
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Machinery health management becomes an essential issue in many sectors. The ultimate goal is to predict machinery degradation and accordingly plan maintenance actions. However, prediction becomes much harder if data is noisy. We propose a procedure for on-line prediction of the forthcoming machine state. This procedure is dedicated to the non-Gaussian (impulsive) health index (HI) data. It is based on a simplified degradation model with three machine states, i.e. healthy, warning and alarm, described in terms of a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). Using simulated trajectories we demonstrate that the α-stable HMM dedicated to time series with impulsive behaviour outperforms the classical Gaussian approach and can be an efficient alternative in such a case. In particular, the percentage errors of the predicted alarm state transition points decrease from 20%−45% to 1%−6%, if the α-stable HMM is used instead of the Gaussian one. We illustrate the proposed methodology for two datasets acquired during experiment on the VIBstand test rig and for a benchmark FEMTO dataset.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work of WŻ, RZ and AW was supported by National Center of Science under Sheng2 project No. UMO2021/40/Q/ST8/00024 "NonGauMech - New methods of processing non-stationary signals (identification, segmentation, extraction, modeling) with non-Gaussian characteristics for the purpose of monitoring complex mechanical structures". The work of JJ was supported by project No. POIR.01.01.01-00-0350/21 entitled "A universal diagnostic and prognostic module for condition monitoring systems of complex mechanical structures operating in the presence of non-Gaussian disturbances and variable operating conditions" co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund under the Intelligent Development Program. The project was carried out as part of the competition of the National Center for Research and Development no: 1/1.1.1/2021 (Szybka Ścieżka). HS gratefully acknowledges the European Commission for its support of the Marie Sklodowska Curie programme through the ETN MOIRA project (GA 955681). The work of Tomasz Barszcz was supported by Department of Robotics and Mechatronics, AGH University of Cracow
REFERENCES (90)
1.
Cempel C. Limit value in the practice of machine vibration diagnostics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 1990; 4(6): 483–493, https://doi.org/10.1016/0888-3....
 
2.
Żuławiński W, Maraj-Zygmąt K, Shiri H, Wyłomańska A, Zimroz R. Framework for stochastic modelling of long-term non-homogenous data with non-Gaussian characteristics for machine condition prognosis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2023; 184: 109677, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
3.
Janczura J, Barszcz T, Zimroz R, Wyłomańska A. Machine condition change detection based on data segmentation using a three-regime, α-stable Hidden Markov Model. Measurement 2023; 220: 113399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
4.
Shiri H, Zimroz P, Wodecki J, Wyłomańska A, Zimroz R, Szabat K. Using long-term condition monitoring data with non-Gaussian noise for online diagnostics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2023; 200: 110472, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
5.
Nikias CL, Shao M. Signal processing with alpha-stable distributions and applications, USA, Wiley-Interscience: 1995.
 
6.
Lévy P. Calcul des Probabilites. Paris, Gauthier-Villars: 1925.
 
7.
Diez-Olivan A, Del Ser J, Galar D, Sierra B. Data fusion and machine learning for industrial prognosis: trends and perspectives towards industry 4.0. Information Fusion 2019; 50: 92-111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inff....
 
8.
Yan S, Ma B, Zheng C. Health index extracting methodology for degradation modelling and prognosis of mechanical transmissions. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2019; 21(1): 137-44, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
 
9.
Si X-S, Wang W, Hu C-H, Zhou D-H. Remaining useful life estimation - a review on the statistical data driven approaches. European Journal of Operational Research 2011; 213(1): 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor....
 
10.
Ye Z-S, Xie M. Stochastic modelling and analysis of degradation for highly reliable products. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 2015; 31(1): 16-32, https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2....
 
11.
Li Q, Yan C, Chen G, Wang H, Li H, Wu L. Remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearings based on risk assessment and degradation state coefficient. ISA Transactions 2022; 129: 413-428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isat....
 
12.
Heng A, Zhang S, Tan AC, Mathew J. Rotating machinery prognostics: State of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2009; 23(3): 724-739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
13.
Liao L, Köttig F. Review of hybrid prognostics approaches for remaining useful life prediction of engineered systems, and an application to battery life prediction. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 2014; 63(1): 191-207, https//doi.org/10.1109/TR.2014.2299152.
 
14.
Zhao Z, Wu J, Li T, Sun C, Yan R, Chen X. Challenges and opportunities of AI-enabled monitoring, diagnosis & prognosis: A review. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2021; 34(1): 1-29, https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033....
 
15.
Zhan X, Liu Z, Yan H, Wu Z, Guo C, Jia X. A novel method of health indicator construction and remaining useful life prediction based on deep learning. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability 2023; 25(4): 171374, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein/1....
 
16.
Shi Z, Chehade A. A dual-LSTM framework combining change point detection and remaining useful life prediction. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2021; 205: 107257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
17.
Yan B, Ma X, Yang L, Wang H, Wu T. A novel degradation-rate-volatility related effect Wiener process model with its extension to accelerated ageing data analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2020; 204: 107138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
18.
Le Son K, Fouladirad M, Barros A. Remaining useful lifetime estimation and noisy gamma deterioration process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2016; 149: 76-87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
19.
Nguyen KT, Fouladirad M, Grall A. Model selection for degradation modeling and prognosis with health monitoring data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2018; 169:105 – 116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
20.
Ye Y, Yang Q, Zhang J, Meng S, Wang J. A dynamic data driven reliability prognosis method for structural digital twin and experimental validation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2023; 240: 109543, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
21.
Jablonski A, Barszcz T, Bielecka M, Breuhaus P. Modeling of probability distribution functions for automatic threshold calculation in condition monitoring systems. Measurement 2013; 46(1): 727-738, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
22.
Jin X, Sun Y, Que Z, Wang Y, Chow TW. Anomaly detection and fault prognosis for bearings. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2016; 65(9): 2046-2054, https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TIM.2016.2570398.
 
23.
Jiang W, Hong Y, Zhou B, He X, Cheng C. A GAN-based anomaly detection approach for imbalanced industrial time series. IEEE Access 7 2019: 143608-143619, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS....
 
24.
Vos K, Peng Z, Jenkins C, Shahriar MR, Borghesani P, Wang W. Vibration-based anomaly detection using LSTM/SVM approaches. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2022; 169: 108752, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
25.
Yan B, Ma X, Huang G, Zhao Y. Two-stage physics-based Wiener process models for online RUL prediction in field vibration data. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2021; 152: 107378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
26.
Huang M, Yu W, Yang F. Analysis of remaining useful life of slope based on nonlinear Wiener process. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2024, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein/1....
 
27.
Huang Z, Xu Z, Ke X, Wang W, Sun Y. Remaining useful life prediction for an adaptive skew-Wiener process model. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2017; 87: 294-306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
28.
Xi X, Chen M, Zhang H, Zhou D. An improved non-Markovian degradation model with long-term dependency and item-to-item uncertainty. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2018; 105: 467-480, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
29.
Zhang H, Zhou D, Chen M, Shang J. FBM-Based Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Degradation Processes With Long-Range Dependence and Multiple Modes. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 2019; 68(3): 1021-1033, https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.201....
 
30.
Ling M, Ng H, Tsui K. Bayesian and likelihood inferences on remaining useful life in two-phase degradation models under gamma process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2019; 184: 77-85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
31.
Liu H, Song W, Niu Y, Zio E. A generalized Cauchy method for remaining useful life prediction of wind turbine gearboxes. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2021; 153: 107471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
32.
Liu H, Song W, Zhang Y, Kudreyko A. Generalized Cauchy degradation model with long-range dependence and maximum Lyapunov exponent for remaining useful life. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2021; 70: 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.20....
 
33.
Song W, Liu H, Zio E. Long-range dependence and heavy tail characteristics for remaining useful life prediction in rolling bearing degradation. Applied Mathematical Modelling 2022; 102: 268-284, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.....
 
34.
Duan S, Song W, Zio E, Cattani C, Li M. Product technical life prediction based on multi-modes and fractional Lévy stable motion. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2021; 161: 107974, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
35.
Yuan Y, Song W. Degradation prediction of tool based on fractional Levy prediction model. 2022 Global Reliability and Prognostics and Health Management (PHM-Yantai) 2022: 1-4, https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM-Ya....
 
36.
Li M. Multi-fractional generalized Cauchy process and its application to teletraffic. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2020; 550: 123982.
 
37.
Song W, Duan S, Zio E, Kudreyko A. Multifractional and long-range dependent characteristics for remaining useful life prediction of cracking gas compressor. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2022; 225: 108630, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phys....
 
38.
Lim C, Mba D. Switching Kalman filter for failure prognostic. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2015; 52-53(1): 426-435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
39.
Kordestani M, Samadi MF, Saif M, Khorasani K. A new fault prognosis of MFS system using integrated extended Kalman filter and Bayesian method. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2018, https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TII.2018.2815036.
 
40.
Singleton RK, Strangas EG, Aviyente S. Extended Kalman filtering for remaining-useful-life estimation of bearings. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2015; 62(3): 1781 – 1790, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.20....
 
41.
Reuben L, Mba D. Diagnostics and prognostics using switching Kalman filters. Structural Health Monitoring 2014; 13(3): 296-306, https://doi.org/10.1177/147592....
 
42.
Cheng P, Wang H, Stojanovic V, He S, Shi K, Luan X, Liu F, Sun C. Asynchronous fault detection observer for 2-d Markov jump systems. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 2021: 1-12, https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3112699.
 
43.
Cheng P, Chen M, Stojanovic V, He S. Asynchronous fault detection filtering for piecewise homogenous Markov jump linear systems via a dual hidden Markov model. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2021; 151: 107353, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
44.
Sun J, Zuo H, Wang W, Pecht MG. Application of a state space modeling technique to system prognostics based on a health index for condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2012; 28: 585 – 596, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
45.
Nedić N, Pršić D, Fragassa C, Stojanović V, Pavlovic A. Simulation of hydraulic check valve for forestry equipment. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems 2017; 24(3): 260-276, https:/doi.org/ 10.1504/IJHVS.2017.084875.
 
46.
Okoh C, Roy R, Mehnen J, Redding L. Overview of remaining useful life prediction techniques in through-life engineering services. Procedia CIRP 2013; 16: 158-163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proc....
 
47.
Zhang Z, Si X, Hu C, Lei Y. Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods. European Journal of Operational Research 2018; 271 (3): 775-796, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor....
 
48.
Lei Y, Li N, Guo L, Li N, Yan T, Lin J. Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2018; 104: 799-834, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
49.
Li Y, Zhang X, Ran Y, Zhang G. Reliability modeling and analysis for CNC machine tool based on meta-action. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2021; 37: 1451–1467, https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.28....
 
50.
Baum LE, Petrie T. Statistical Inference for Probabilistic Functions of Finite State Markov Chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1966; 37(6): 1554 – 1563, https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1....
 
51.
Mor B, Garhwal S, Kumar A. A systematic review of hidden Markov models and their applications. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2021; 28: 1429-1448, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831....
 
52.
Chen J-H, Zou S-L. An intelligent condition monitoring approach for spent nuclear fuel shearing machines based on noise signals. Applied Sciences 2018; 8(5), https://doi.org/10.3390/app805....
 
53.
Sadhu A, Prakash G, Narasimhan S. A hybrid hidden Markov model towards fault detection of rotating components. Journal of Vibration and Control 2017; 23(19): 3175-3195, https://doi.org/10.1177/107754....
 
54.
Hwang KH, Lee JM, Hwang Y. A new machine condition monitoring method based on likelihood change of a stochastic model. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2013; 41(1): 357-365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
55.
Ocak H, Loparo KA. HMM-Based Fault Detection and Diagnosis Scheme for Rolling Element Bearings. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 2004; 127(4): 299-306, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1924....
 
56.
Fan L, Wang S, Duan H, Ran H. Fatigue crack fault diagnosis and prognosis based on hidden semi-Markov model. The Journal of Engineering 2019; 2019(13): 406-410, https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.20....
 
57.
Ying J, Kirubarajan T, Pattipati K, Patterson-Hine A. A hidden Markov model-based algorithm for fault diagnosis with partial and imperfect tests. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews 2000; 30: 463-473, https://doi.org/10.1109/5326.8....
 
58.
Pravin RN, Raman KG, Kumar PP, Bharathi KS, Shajeev M. Performance evaluation of HMM and neural network in motorbike fault detection system. 2011 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT), Chennai, India 2011: 1175-1179, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRTIT....
 
59.
Zhao Q. Fault diagnosis method for wind power equipment based on hidden Markov model. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2022; 2022(4): 1-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022....
 
60.
Tobon-Mejia DA, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, Tripot G. Hidden Markov models for failure diagnostic and prognostic. 2011 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference, IEEE 2011: 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.20....
 
61.
Zhou Z-J, Hu C-H, Xu D-L, Chen M-Y, Zhou D-H. A model for real-time failure prognosis based on hidden Markov model and belief rule base. European Journal of Operational Research 2010; 207(1): 269-283, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor....
 
62.
Soualhi A, Clerc G, Razik H. Fault prognosis based on hidden Markov models. 2015 IEEE Workshop on Electrical Machines Design, Control and Diagnosis (WEMDCD) 2015: 271-278, https://doi.org/10.1109/WEMDCD....
 
63.
Zhiyong G, Jiwu L, Rongxi W. Prognostics uncertainty reduction by right-time prediction of remaining useful life based on hidden Markov model and proportional hazard model. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność - Maintenance and Reliability 2021; 23(1): 154-164, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
 
64.
Baruah P, Chinnam RB. HMMs for diagnostics and prognostics in machining processes. International Journal of Production Research 2005; 43(6): 1275-1293, https://doi.org/10.1080/002075....
 
65.
Eleftheroglou N, Galanopoulos G, Loutas T. Similarity learning hidden semi-Markov model for adaptive prognostics of composite structures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2004; 243: 109808, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
66.
Ramezani SB, Killen B, Cummins L, Rahimi S, Amirlatifi A, Seale M. A survey of HMM-based algorithms in machinery fault prediction. 2021 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 2021: 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI50....
 
67.
Mandelbrot B. The Pareto-Lévy Law and the distribution of income. International Economic Review 1960; 1(2): 79-106, https://doi.org/10.2307/252528....
 
68.
Chouri B, Fabrice M, Dandache A, Aroussi MEl, Saadane R. Bearing fault diagnosis based on alpha-stable distribution feature extraction and SVM classifier. 2014 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS) 2014: 1545-1550, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMCS.....
 
69.
Gao M, Yu G, Wang T. Impulsive gear fault diagnosis using adaptive Morlet wavelet filter based on alpha-stable distribution and kurtogram. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 72283-72296, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS....
 
70.
Xiong Q, Zhang W, Xu Y, Peng Y, Deng P. Alpha-stable distribution and multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis-based fault diagnosis method application for axle box bearings. Shock and Vibration 2018; 2018: 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1....
 
71.
Gang Y, Changning L, Xu Y, Jianfeng Z. A new statistical modeling and detection method for rolling element bearing faults based on alpha-stable distribution. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2013; 41(1-2): 155-175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
72.
Li X, Teng W, Peng D, Ma T, Wu X, Liu Y. Feature fusion model based health indicator construction and selfconstraint state-space estimator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings in wind turbines. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2023; 233:109124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
73.
Hou W, Peng Y. Adaptive ensemble gaussian process regression-driven degradation prognosis with applications to bearing degradation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2023; 239: 109479, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
74.
Saha DK, Hoque ME, Badihi H. Development of intelligent fault diagnosis technique of rotary machine element bearing: a machine learning approach. Sensors 2022; 22(3): 1073, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031....
 
75.
Niu G, Liu E, Wang X, Zhang B. A hybrid bearing prognostic method with fault diagnosis and model fusion. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2023; 20(1): 864-872, https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.20....
 
76.
Islam MM, Prosvirin AE, Kim J-M. Data-driven prognostic scheme for rolling-element bearings using a new health index and variants of least-square support vector machines. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2021; 160: 107853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
77.
Li W, Shang Z, Gao M, Qian S, Feng Z. Remaining useful life prediction based on transfer multi-stage shrinkage attention temporal convolutional network under variable working conditions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2022; 226: 108722, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress... .
 
78.
Suh S, Lukowicz P, Lee YO. Generalized multiscale feature extraction for remaining useful life prediction of bearings with generative adversarial networks. Knowledge-Based Systems 2022; 237: 107866, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knos....
 
79.
Lin T, Song L, Cui L, Wang H. Advancing RUL prediction in mechanical systems: A hybrid deep learning approach utilizing non-full lifecycle data. Advanced Engineering Informatics 2024; 61: 102524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.....
 
80.
Sternharz G, Elhalwagy A, Kalganova T. Data-efficient estimation of remaining useful life for machinery with a limited number of run-to-failure training sequences. IEEE Access 2022; 10: 129443-129464, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS....
 
81.
Bhavsar K, Vakharia V. Prediction of remaining useful life (RUL) of bearing using exponential degradation model. In Sudarshan TS, Pandey KM, Misra RD, Patowari PK, Bhaumik S (eds.): Recent Advancements in Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Singapore, Springer: 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
 
82.
Nolan JP. Univariate Stable Distributions: Models for Heavy Tailed Data, Springer: 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
83.
Zaidi SSH, Aviyente S, Salman M, Shin K-K, Strangas EG. Prognosis of gear failures in DC starter motors using hidden Markov models. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2011; 58(5): 1695-1706, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.20....
 
84.
Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1977; 39(1): 1-22, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517....
 
85.
Kim CJ. Dynamic linear models with Markov-switching. Journal of Econometrics 1994; 60: 1-22, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4....
 
86.
Nolan JP. Numerical calculation of stable densities and distribution functions. Communications in Statistics - Stochastic Models 1997; 13: 759-774, https://doi.org/10.1080/153263....
 
87.
Rousseeuw PJ, Croux C. Alternatives to the median absolute deviation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993; 88(424): 1273–1283, https://doi.org/10.2307/229126....
 
88.
Brockwell PJ, Davis RA. Introduction to time series and forecasting, Springer: 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
89.
Ma Y, Genton MG, Highly robust estimation of the autocovariance function, Journal of Time Series Analysis 2000; 21(6): 663–684, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9....
 
90.
Chambers JM, Mallows CL, Stuck BW. A method for simulating stable random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1976; 71(354): 340–344, https://doi.org/10.2307/228530....
 
eISSN:2956-3860
ISSN:1507-2711
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top