Search for Author, Title, Keyword
RESEARCH PAPER
Enhancing Demolition Works Safety: Integrating Numerical and Experimental Methods for Structural Failure Prevention in Remote-Controlled Demolition Robots.
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Machine Design and Testing, Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2024-01-22
 
 
Final revision date: 2024-04-19
 
 
Acceptance date: 2024-06-25
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-07-13
 
 
Publication date: 2024-07-13
 
 
Corresponding author
Jakub Andruszko   

Department of Machine Design and Testing, Wroclaw University of Technology, Ignacego Lukasiewicza 7/9, 50-371, Wroclaw, Poland
 
 
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2024;26(4):190466
 
HIGHLIGHTS
  • Method from FEM and test data proposed to avert machine structural failure.
  • The actual dynamic loads and the counting of load cycles problem solved.
  • The FEM model with test data outperforms classical methods in fatigue assessment.
  • The proposed method allows to prevent uncontrolled damage to the machine structure
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The paper presents an approach that combines numerical and experimental techniques to evaluate the possibility of failure prevention of the structure of demolition robots. Based on a real example of the machine, the possibility of application and development of the author's method was presented. The main problem when designing this type of machine is the negligible knowledge of how dynamic loads act during operation and how many times they appear. Underestimating the loads and their cycles when designing these types of machines can cause them to become damaged quickly. The method presented in the article allows to solve the problem of determining the key parameters needed in the evaluation of this type of construction such as loads, but also allows to determine the number of load cycles, which is particularly important for fatigue. The result presented in the article is an authors’ method that allows determining the fatigue of the structure of a demolition machine by combining numerical and experimental techniques.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Bienia H, Noll T. First use of industrial robots in the demolition of a French nuclear power plant. Kernkraft Deutschl Betriebserg 2012; 57: 337–342.
 
2.
Advanced Robotic Engineering - Remote Controlled Demolition Robots Producer. Available online: www.arerobot.com (accessed on 12 May 2023).
 
3.
BROKK - Remote Controlled Demolition Robots Producer. www.brokk.com (accessed on 12 May 2023).
 
4.
Husqvarna - Remote Controlled Demolition Robots Producer. www.husqvarnaconstruction.com (accessed on 12 May 2023).
 
5.
Derlukiewicz D. Application of a Design and Construction Method Based on a Study of User Needs in the Prevention of Accidents Involving Operators of Demolition Robots. Applied Science 2019; 9: 1500, https://doi.org/10.3390/app907....
 
6.
Zhu Q, Lu P, Xiang Q. Fatigue life evaluation of web butt welding structure on boom of excavator by hot spot stress approach. Engineering Failure Analysis 2020; 113(2): 104547; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engf....
 
7.
Chudzik A, Warda B. Fatigue life prediction of a radial cylindrical roller bearing subjected to a combined load using FEM. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2020; 22 (2): 212–220, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein....
 
8.
Gebremicheal G, Chen J, Zaman M, Pang H. Design and Finite Element Analysis of a Hydraulic Excavator Boom. Advanced Materials Research 2012; 538-541: 568-571; https://10.4028/www.scientific....
 
9.
Chunlei Y, Yingchao B, Qi L. Finite element analysis of excavator mechanical behavior and boom structure optimization. Measurement 2021; 173; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
10.
Qi X, Zhang J. ANSYS workbench for static analysis of excavator arm. Advanced Materials Research 2014; 926-930: 759-762;.
 
12.
Meng Ch, Fan S, Han L. The Finite Element Analysis of the Boom of 20-ton Backhoe Hydraulic Excavator Based on ANSYS. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2019; 49: 37–42; https://10.1088/1757-899X/538/....
 
13.
Li Y, Ma B, Xia X, Wang J, Hao J, Cao J, Yu Z, Yi X, Zeng K. Fatigue Life of Hydraulic Excavator Undercarriage. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA) 2020; 1833-1837; https://10.1109/ICMA49215.2020....
 
14.
Tang H, Yuan X. Fatigue Life Analysis of a Heavy Dump Truck Frame Under Different Load Conditions. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering 2016; 11: 1745-1750; https://10.13433/j.cnki.1003-8....
 
15.
Wang Q, Wang Y, Wei Z. Failure assessment and life calculation of welded joints based on parameter table optimization algorithm. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 2023; 15: 2; https://doi:10.1177/1687813222....
 
16.
Zhang S, Lu D, Li R, et al. Fatigue life optimization and lightweight design of wheel based on entropy weight grey relation analysis and modified NSGA-II. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 2023; 15: 8; https://doi:10.1177/1687813223....
 
17.
Moczko P, Pietrusiak D, Wieckowski J. Investigation of the failure of the bucket wheel excavator bridge conveyor. Engineering Failure Analysis 2019; 106; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engf....
 
18.
Sokolski P, Smolnicki T. A Method for Monitoring the Technical Condition of Large-Scale Bearing Nodes in the Bodies of Machines Operating for Extended Periods of Time. Energies 2021; 14: 6637; https://doi.org/10.3390/en1420....
 
19.
Misiewicz R; Moczko P, Boyce B. The use of thermoelastic stress analysis for stress distribution evaluation of an industrial equipment under regular operating conditions. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 2022; 22;https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452....
 
20.
Łyskawinski W, Jędryczka C, Stachowiak D, Łukaszewicz P, Czarnecki M. Finite element analysis and experimental verification of high reliability synchronous reluctance machine. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2022; 24(2):386-93; https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
 
21.
Yurdern H, Degirmencioglu A, Cakir E. Measurement of strains induced on a three-bottom moldboard plough under load and comparisons with finite element simulations. Measurement 2019; 136: 594–602. https://10.1016/j.measurement.....
 
22.
Solazzi L, Assi A, Ceresoli F. Excavator arms: numerical, experimental and new concept design. Composite Structures 2019; 217: 60–74;.
 
24.
Xiang Q, Lu P, Wang B. Research on characteristics of actual hinge joint load of hydraulic excavator working device. Journal of Mechanical Strength 2018; 40: 1063–1070; https://10.16579/j.issn.1001.9....
 
25.
Ananin V, Emilov A. Operating experience and test results of pit hydraulic excavators. Journal of Machinery Manufacture and Reliability 2017; 46: 414–416, https://doi.org/10.3103/S10526....
 
26.
Hoffmann K. An Introduction to Measurements using Strain Gauges. Strain 2008; 37: 34-243; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475....
 
27.
Pedrammehr S, Farrokhi H, Rajab A, Pakzad S. Mahboubkhah M, Ettefagh M, Sadeghi M. Modal Analysis of the Milling Machine Structure through FEM and Experimental Test. Manufacturing Science and Technology: Advanced Materials Research 2012; 383: 6717 - 6721; https://10.4028/www.scientific....
 
28.
Raghuwanshi N, Parey A. Naresh K. Experimental measurement of gear mesh stiffness of cracked spur gear by strain gauge technique. Measurement 2016; 86: 266–275; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
 
29.
J. Andruszko, D. Derlukiewicz, The numerical-experimental studies of stress distribution in the three-arm boom of the hybrid machine for construction works. Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific Conference on Computer Aided Engineering (Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering); Rusinski, E., Pietrusiak, D., Eds.; Springer, 24 (2019) 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
30.
Li J, Wang Y, Zhang K, Wang Z, Lu J. Design and analysis of demolition robot arm based on finite element method. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 2019; 11: 6; https://10.1177/16878140198539....
 
31.
Osinski Z, Wróbel J. Theory of Machine Construction, (Teoria Konstrukcji Maszyn - In Polish). Polish Scientific Publishers (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Nukowe) 1982.
 
32.
Dietrich M. Basics of the Machine Construction Vol 1 (Podstawy Konstrukcji Maszyn Tom 1 - In Polish). Scientific and Technical Publishers (Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne) 1999.
 
33.
Dietrych J. Designing and Construction (Projektowanie i Konstruowanie - In Polish). Scientific and Technical Publishers (Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne) 1974.
 
34.
EN 1993-1-9:2005 standard - Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-9: Fatigue. European Committee for Standardization 2005.
 
35.
Hobbacher A. Recommendation for fatigue design of welded joints and components. Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016; 2: 10-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
 
36.
Smith M. ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual, Version 6.9. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, 2009.
 
37.
HBM Strain Gauges. www.hbm.com/fr/7163/wheatstone-bridge-circuit (accessed on 28 May 2023).
 
38.
He L, Feng B. Fundamentals of Measurement and Signal Analysis. Springer Nature Singapore 2022; 352; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98....
 
39.
Kauzlarich J. The Palmgren-Miner rule derived. Tribology Series 1989; 14: 175-179; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-....
 
40.
Puri G. Python Scripts for Abaqus: Learn by Example. Charleston 2011; 352.
 
eISSN:2956-3860
ISSN:1507-2711
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top