RESEARCH PAPER
A novel approach to optimize the maintenance strategies: a case in the hydroelectric power plant
1
Industrial Engineering Department, Kırıkkale University, 71451, Kırıkkale, Turkey
Publication date: 2021-06-30
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2021;23(2):324-337
HIGHLIGHTS
- The maintenance strategy optimization model, which takes into account the wear rate, has been proposed.
- AHP, COPRAS and integer programming methods are used.
- The problem is addressed in the system dimension.
- A feasible model has been proposed.
KEYWORDS
maintenance managementmaintenance strategy optimizationmulti-criteria decision makingAHPCOPRASinteger programming
ABSTRACT
Countries need to develop sustainable energy policies based on the principles of environmental sensitivity, reliability, efficiency, economy and uninterrupted service and to maintain
their energy supply in order to increase their global competitiveness. In addition to this
impact of sustainable energy supply on the global world, maintenance processes in power
plants require high costs due to allocated time, materials and labor, and generation loss.
Thus, the maintenance needs to be managed within a system. This makes analytical and feasible maintenance planning a necessity in power plants. In this context, this study focuses on
maintenance strategy optimization which is the first phase of maintenance planning for one
of the large-scale hydroelectric power plants with a direct effect on Turkey's energy supply
security with its one fifth share in total generation. In this study, a new model is proposed for
the maintenance strategy optimization problem considering the multi-objective and multicriteria structure of hydroelectric power plants with hundreds of complex equipment and the
direct effect of these equipment on uninterrupted and cost-effective electricity generation.
In the model, two multi-criteria decision-making methods, AHP and COPRAS methods,
are integrated with integer programming method and optimal maintenance strategies are
obtained for 571 equipment.
REFERENCES (64)
1.
Aghaie M, Fazli S. An improved MCDM method for maintenance approach selection: A case study of auto industry. Management Science Letters 2012; 2(1): 137-146, https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.....
2.
Alaswad S, Xiang Y. A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2017; 157: 54-63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
3.
Arabameri A, Yamani M, Pradhan B et al. Novel ensembles of COPRAS multi-criteria decision-making with logistic regression, boosted regression tree, and random forest for spatial prediction of gully erosion susceptibility. Science of The Total Environment 2019; 688: 903-916, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
4.
Arunraj N S, Maiti J. Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming. Safety science 2010; 48(2): 238-247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci....
5.
Bagassi S, De Crescenzio F, Piastra S. Augmented reality technology selection based on integrated QFD-AHP model. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 2020; 14(1): 285-294, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008....
6.
Bastos L S L, Marchesi J F, Hamacher S, Fleck J L. A mixed integer programming approach to the patient admission scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research 2019; 273(3): 831-840, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor....
7.
Benítez P, Rocha E, Varum H, Rodrigues F. A dynamic multi-criteria decision-making model for the maintenance planning of reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Building Engineering 2020; 27: 100971, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe....
8.
Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M. A combined goal programming-AHP approach to maintenance selection problem. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2006; 91(7): 839-848, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
9.
Braglia M, Castellano D, Frosolini M. An integer linear programming approach to maintenance strategies selection. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 2013; 30(9): 991-1016, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-....
10.
Bureika G, Bekintis G, Liudvinavičius L, Vaičiūnas G. Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process to assess traffic safety risk of railway infrastructure. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2013; 15(4): 376-383.
11.
Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G, Güleryüz S. Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert systems with applications 2011; 38(8): 9407-9424, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa....
12.
Büyüközkan G, Göçer F. An extention of ARAS methodology based on interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for digital supply chain. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), Naples, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZIE....
13.
Carpitella S, Certa A, Izquierdo J, La Fata C M. A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2018; 169: 394-402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
14.
Carpitella S, Mzougui I, Benítez J et al. A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: the case of a marine salt manufacture firm. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2020: 107265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
15.
Chua S J L, Ali A S, Alias A Bin. Implementation of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) decision making framework for building maintenance procurement selection: Case study of Malaysian public universities. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2015; 17(1):7-18, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
16.
Ding S-H, Kamaruddin S. Maintenance policy optimization-literature review and directions. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2015; 76(5-8): 1263-1283, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170....
17.
Ding S-H, Kamaruddin S, Azid I A. Development of a model for optimal maintenance policy selection. European Journal of Industrial Engineering 2014; 8(1): 50-68, https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2....
18.
Doljak D, Stanojević G. Evaluation of natural conditions for site selection of ground-mounted photovoltaic power plants in Serbia. Energy 2017; 127: 291-300, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
19.
Emovon I, Norman R A, Murphy A J. Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems. Journal of intelligent manufacturing 2018; 29(3): 519-531, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845....
20.
Feng Z, Niu W, Wang W et al. A mixed integer linear programming model for unit commitment of thermal plants with peak shaving operation aspect in regional power grid lack of flexible hydropower energy. Energy 2019; 175: 618-629, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
21.
Fetanat A, Khorasaninejad E. Size optimization for hybrid photovoltaic-wind energy system using ant colony optimization for continuous domains based integer programming. Applied Soft Computing 2015; 31: 196-209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc....
22.
Fouladgar M M, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Lashgari A et al. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment. International journal of strategic property management 2012; 16(1): 85-104, https://doi.org/10.3846/164871....
23.
George-Williams H, Patelli E. Maintenance strategy optimization for complex power systems susceptible to maintenance delays and operational dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 2017; 66(4): 1309-1330, https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.201....
24.
Ghosh D, Roy S. A decision-making framework for process plant maintenance. European Journal of Industrial Engineering 2009; 4(1): 78-98, https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2....
25.
Goossens A J M, Basten R J I. Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; an application for naval ships. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2015; 142: 31-41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
26.
Hashemi M, Asadi M, Zarezadeh S. Optimal maintenance policies for coherent systems with multi-type components. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2020; 195: 106674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
27.
Hashemkhani Zolfani S, Bahrami M. Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 2014; 20(3): 534-553, https://doi.org/10.3846/202949....
28.
Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. Application of hybrid VIKOR model in selection of maintenance strategy. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM) 2012; 5(2): 59-81, https://doi.org/10.4018/jisscm....
29.
Jajimoggala S, Rao V V S K, Satyanarayana B. Maintenance strategy evaluation using ANP and goal programming. Management Theories and Strategic Practices for Decision Making, IGI Global: 2013: 117-138, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-....
30.
Jünger M, Liebling T M, Naddef D et al. 50 Years of integer programming 1958-2008: From the early years to the state-of-the-art. Springer Science & Business Media: 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
31.
Kato S, Fukumura N, Morito S et al. A Mixed Integer Linear Programming Approach to a Rolling Stock Rostering Problem with Splitting and Combining. RailNorrköping 2019. 8th International Conference on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis (ICROMA), Norrköping, Sweden, June 17th-20th, 2019, Linköping University Electronic Press: 2019; (069): 548-564.
32.
Kim C S, Djamaludin I, Murthy D N P. Warranty and discrete preventive maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2004; 84(3):301-309, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
33.
Kiran Y V, Mahanty B. Reliability design of embedded systems. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2006; 30(2):4-7.
34.
Kurian M C, Shalij P.R, Pramod V.R. Maintenance strategy selection in a cement industry using analytic network process. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2019; 26(4): 509-525, https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-0....
35.
Labib A W. A decision analysis model for maintenance policy selection using a CMMS. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2004; 10(3): 191-202, https://doi.org/10.1108/135525....
36.
Márquez A C. The maintenance management framework: models and methods for complex systems maintenance. Springer-Verlag London: 2007. doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-821-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-....
37.
Martorell S, Villanueva J F, Carlos S et al. RAMS+ C informed decision-making with application to multi-objective optimization of technical specifications and maintenance using genetic algorithms. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2005; 87(1): 65-75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
38.
Nezami F G, Yildirim M B. A sustainability approach for selecting maintenance strategy. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 2013; 6(4): 332-343, https://doi.org/10.1080/193970....
39.
Nguyen K-A, Do P, Grall A. Multi-level predictive maintenance for multi-component systems. Reliability engineering & system safety 2015; 144: 83-94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
40.
Nguyen K-A, Do P, Grall A. Joint predictive maintenance and inventory strategy for multi-component systems using Birnbaum's structural importance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2017; 168: 249-261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
41.
Özbek A. Performance Evaluation Of Turkey Diyanet Foundation By SAW, COPRAS and TOPSIS Method. Journal of Management and Economics Research 2017; 15(1): 66-84.
42.
Özcan E, Danışan T, Eren T. A mathematical model proposal for maintenance strategies optimization of the most critical electrical equipment groups of hydroelectric power plants. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences 2019; 25(4): 498-506, https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.....
43.
Özcan E C, Danışan T, Yumuşak R, Eren T. An artificial neural network model supported with multi criteria decision making approaches for maintenance planning in hydroelectric power plants. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2020; 21(3): 400-418, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
44.
Özcan E C, Ünlüsoy S, Eren T. A combined goal programming - AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 78(April): 1410-1423, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
45.
Panchal D, Chatterjee P, Shukla R K et al. Integrated Fuzzy AHP-CODAS Framework for Maintenance Decision in Urea Fertilizer Industry. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research 2017; 51(3) .
46.
Panchal D, Kumar D. Maintenance decision-making for power generating unit in thermal power plant using combined fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach. International Journal of Operational Research 2017; 29(2): 248-272, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2....
47.
Pourjavad E, Shirouyehzad H, Shahin A. Selecting maintenance strategy in mining industry by analytic network process and TOPSIS. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering 2013; 15(2): 171-192, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.....
48.
Rusin A, Wojaczek A. Improving the availability and lengthening the life of power unit elements through the use of risk-based maintenance planning. Energy 2019; 180: 28-35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
49.
Saaty T L. The analytical hierarchy process, planning, priority. Resource Allocation. RWS Publications, USA 1980.
50.
Sagar M K, Jayaswal P, Kushwah K. Exploring fuzzy SAW method for maintenance strategy selection problem of material handling equipment. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology 2013; 3(2): 600-605.
51.
Sankpal P, Andrew A, Kumanan S. Maintenance Strategies selection using Fuzzy FMEA and Integer Programming. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Production and Industrial Engineering, 2015: 503.
52.
Shafiee M. Maintenance strategy selection problem: an MCDM overview. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2015; 21(4): 378-402, https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-0....
53.
Shafiee M, Labib A, Maiti J, Starr A. Maintenance strategy selection for multi-component systems using a combined analytic network process and cost-risk criticality model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 2019;233(2): 89-104, https://doi.org/10.1177/174800....
54.
Shen L, Yang J, Jin X et al. Based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process to construct the evaluation index system of nursing simulation teaching quality. Nurse education today 2019; 79: 67-73, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt....
55.
Shyjith K, Ilangkumaran M, Kumanan S. Multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2008; 14(4): 375-386, https://doi.org/10.1108/135525....
56.
Si T, Wang C, Liu R et al. Multi-criteria comprehensive energy efficiency assessment based on fuzzy-AHP method: A case study of posttreatment technologies for coal-fired units. Energy 2020: 117533, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ener....
57.
Taha H A. Integer programming: theory, applications, and computations. Academic Press: 2014.
58.
Vahdani B, Hadipour H. Extension of the ELECTRE method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Soft Computing 2011; 15(3): 569-579, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500....
59.
Wang J J, Jing Y Y, Zhang C F, Zhao J H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009; 13(9): 2263-2278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser....
60.
Wang Y, Deng C, Wu J et al. A corrective maintenance scheme for engineering equipment. Engineering Failure Analysis 2014; 36: 269-283, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engf....
61.
Wang Y, Liu Z, Liu Y. Optimal preventive maintenance strategy for repairable items under two-dimensional warranty. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2015; 142: 326-333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
62.
Zaim S, Turkyılmaz A, Acar M F et al. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: a case study. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2012; 18(1): 16-29, https://doi.org/10.1108/135525....
63.
Zavadskas E K, Kaklauskas A, Sarka V. The new method of multicriteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technological and economic development of economy 1994; 1(3): 131-139.
64.
Zhang C, Gao W, Guo S et al. Opportunistic maintenance for wind turbines considering imperfect , reliability-based maintenance. Renewable Energy 2017; 103: 606-612, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rene....
CITATIONS (14):
1.
DEPO YÖNETİMİNDE ENDÜSTRİ 4.0 UYGULAMASI: BİR İŞLETME İÇİN RFID TEKNOLOJİ SEÇİMİ
Ebru TAŞKIN, Nisanur GEZİK, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Endüstri Mühendisliği
Ebru TAŞKIN, Nisanur GEZİK, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Endüstri Mühendisliği
2.
Opportunistic maintenance strategy of a Heave Compensation System for expected performance degradation
Chao Zhang, Yujie Qian, Hongyan Dui, Shaoping Wang, Rentong Chen, Mileta Tomovic
Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability
Chao Zhang, Yujie Qian, Hongyan Dui, Shaoping Wang, Rentong Chen, Mileta Tomovic
Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability
3.
Yenilenebilir Hibrit Enerji Santrali Uygulamasında Tesis Yer Seçimi
Mert KARA, Yiğitcan ERCAN, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Ahmet CÜREBAL, Tamer EREN
Uluslararası Muhendislik Arastirma ve Gelistirme Dergisi
Mert KARA, Yiğitcan ERCAN, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Ahmet CÜREBAL, Tamer EREN
Uluslararası Muhendislik Arastirma ve Gelistirme Dergisi
4.
Siber Güvenlik Uzmanın Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Seçilmesi
Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri ve Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi
Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Uluslararası Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri ve Bilgisayar Bilimleri Dergisi
5.
A Review of Sustainable Maintenance Strategies for Single Component and Multicomponent Equipment
Jingyi Zhao, Chunhai Gao, Tao Tang
Sustainability
Jingyi Zhao, Chunhai Gao, Tao Tang
Sustainability
6.
Dijital Pazarlama Strateji Seçimi: SWOT Analizi Ve Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri
Berk SAÇAN, Tamer EREN
Journal of Polytechnic
Berk SAÇAN, Tamer EREN
Journal of Polytechnic
7.
Anız Yangınlarına Müdahale için İtfaiye Drone Seçimi: Giresun Örneği
Mert KARA, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Journal of Aviation Research
Mert KARA, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Journal of Aviation Research
8.
Pandemi Sürecinde Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi için İlaç Deposu ve Aşı Dağıtım Merkezi Yeri Seçimi
Nursena ORAL, Selma YAPICI, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Politeknik Dergisi
Nursena ORAL, Selma YAPICI, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Politeknik Dergisi
9.
A New Approach to Production Process Capability Assessment for Non-Normal Data
Anna Borucka, Edward Kozłowski, Katarzyna Antosz, Rafał Parczewski
Applied Sciences
Anna Borucka, Edward Kozłowski, Katarzyna Antosz, Rafał Parczewski
Applied Sciences
10.
Acil Yardım Müdahalesi Yapan Birimler için Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Kargo Drone Seçimi
Mert KARA, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Türkiye İnsansız Hava Araçları Dergisi
Mert KARA, Rabia YUMUŞAK, Tamer EREN
Türkiye İnsansız Hava Araçları Dergisi
11.
An efficient maintenance strategy selection model using multi-criteria mathematical programming method
Mohanned Mohammed Oudah, Alla Eldin H. Kassam
4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN IOT, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (IIRA 4.0)
Mohanned Mohammed Oudah, Alla Eldin H. Kassam
4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN IOT, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (IIRA 4.0)
12.
Multi-criteria decision-making approach in maintenance strategy selection: A review and descriptive analysis
Mohanned M. Oudah, Alla Eldin H. Kassam
4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN IOT, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (IIRA 4.0)
Mohanned M. Oudah, Alla Eldin H. Kassam
4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN IOT, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (IIRA 4.0)
13.
Industrial Power Needs in Bangladesh: A Fuzzy MCDM Analysis of Captive versus Grid Solutions
Sujan Banik, Iftheker Ahmed Khan, AKM Monjur Morshed, Md. Ziaur Rahman Khan, Md Aman Uddin
Results in Engineering
Sujan Banik, Iftheker Ahmed Khan, AKM Monjur Morshed, Md. Ziaur Rahman Khan, Md Aman Uddin
Results in Engineering
14.
A Global Perspective on Road Condition Assessment and Maintenance: Trends in Research and Technology Integration
Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan, Muhammad Ridwan Anas, Nurul Ika Putri Dalimunthe, Muhammad Thoriq Al Fath, Rezky Ariessa Dewi, Gea Geby Aurora Syafridon, Indra Jaya, Syahrizal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Gina Cynthia Raphita Hasibuan, Muhammad Ridwan Anas, Nurul Ika Putri Dalimunthe, Muhammad Thoriq Al Fath, Rezky Ariessa Dewi, Gea Geby Aurora Syafridon, Indra Jaya, Syahrizal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2956-3860 |
| ISSN: | 1507-2711 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
