RESEARCH PAPER
Streamlining Smart Grids Reliability Assessment: An Innovative Mapping Approach
1
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,, Final International University, Turkey
2
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Final International University, , Turkey, Turkey
3
Department of maintenance and repairment,, Ekbatan Gas Control Co (EGC), Iran
Submission date: 2024-05-30
Final revision date: 2024-09-25
Acceptance date: 2024-10-26
Online publication date: 2024-11-03
Publication date: 2024-11-03
Corresponding author
Mohammadreza Gholami
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,, Final International University, 99320, Kyrenia, Turkey
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,, Final International University, 99320, Kyrenia, Turkey
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2025;27(2):195258
HIGHLIGHTS
- Proposed streamlining approach reduces system states significantly, enhancing computational efficiency.
- Redundant elements do not guarantee enhanced reliability for the entire cyberphysical power grid.
- Dynamic thermal rating integration boosts reliability indices of a cyber-physical power grid (up to 43.58% in star topology).
KEYWORDS
Cyber Physical systemsSmart Grid Reliabilitydynamic thermal rating (DTR)Network TopologiesExpected Energy Not Supplied (EENS)
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Assessing smart grid reliability, considering both cyber and physical components, typically involves a mapping step, escalating complexity and computational overhead. This paper presents a pioneering mapping approach that redefines the fundamental paradigm of smart grid reliability assessment. By leveraging a defined interconnection matrix, the method optimizes computational efficiency, curtailing the array of potential system states. Evaluation employing key performance metrics - Loss of Load Probability (LOLP) and Expected Energy Not Supplied (EENS) - quantitatively demonstrates the superiority of our approach. Also, we explore the ramifications of integrating a dynamic thermal rating (DTR) in the process of reliability assessment, augmenting component safety through permissible enhancements in their ratings. Results underscore a notable reduction in total system states, from 221 to 214 for the bus topology and from 222 to 216 for the ring topology. Moreover, the analysis reveal substantial enhancements (Up to 43.58% ) in reliability indices upon consideration of the DTR system.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
H. Jain, M. Kumar, and A. M. Joshi, “Intelligent energy cyber physical systems (iECPS) for reliable smart grid against energy theft and false data injection,” Electr. Eng., vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 331–346, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00202-021-01380-9.
2.
M. Barani, V. V. Vadlamudi, and P. E. Heegaard, “Reliability analysis of cyber-physical microgrids: Study of grid-connected microgrids with communication-based control systems,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 645–663, 2021, doi: 10.1049/gtd2.12049.
3.
L. Yan, M. Sheikholeslami, W. Gong, M. Shahidehpour, and Z. Li, “Architecture, Control, and Implementation of Networked Microgrids for Future Distribution Systems,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 286–299, 2022, doi: 10.35833/MPCE.2021.000669.
4.
T. C. Huang and Y. J. Zhang, “Reliability evaluation of microgrid considering incentive-based demand response,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 222, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/222/1/012017.
5.
Y. Yan, Y. Qian, H. Sharif, and D. Tipper, “A survey on smart grid communication infrastructures: Motivations, requirements and challenges,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–20, 2013, doi: 10.1109/SURV.2012.021312.00034.
6.
G. Andersson et al., “Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1922–1928, 2005, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857942.
7.
R. V. Yohanandhan, R. M. Elavarasan, P. Manoharan, and L. Mihet-Popa, “Cyber-Physical Power System (CPPS): A Review on Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis with Cyber Security Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 151019–151064, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016826.
8.
B. Jimada-Ojuolape and J. Teh, “Impact of the Integration of Information and Communication Technology on Power System Reliability: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 24600–24615, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970598.
9.
T. Adefarati and R. C. Bansal, “Reliability and economic assessment of a microgrid power system with the integration of renewable energy resources,” Appl. Energy, vol. 206, no. May, pp. 911–933, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.228.
10.
S. Bahramirad, W. Reder, and A. Khodaei, “Reliability-constrained optimal sizing of energy storage system in a microgrid,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 2056–2062, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2012.2217991.
11.
J. Marqusee, W. Becker, and S. Ericson, “Resilience and economics of microgrids with PV, battery storage, and networked diesel generators,” Adv. Appl. Energy, vol. 3, no. June, p. 100049, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100049.
12.
B. Falahati, Y. Fu, and L. Wu, “Reliability assessment of smart grid considering direct cyber-power interdependencies,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1515–1524, 2012, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2012.2194520.
13.
B. Falahati and Y. Fu, “Reliability assessment of smart grids considering indirect cyber-power interdependencies,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1677–1685, 2014, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2014.2310742.
14.
H. Lei and C. Singh, “Power system reliability evaluation considering cyber-malfunctions in substations,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 129, no. December, pp. 160–169, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2015.08.010.
15.
M. Memari, A. Karimi, and H. Hashemi-Dezaki, “Clustering-based reliability assessment of smart grids by fuzzy c-means algorithm considering direct cyber–physical interdependencies and system uncertainties,” Sustain. Energy, Grids Networks, vol. 31, p. 100757, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sega....
16.
M. Aslani, H. Hashemi-Dezaki, and A. Ketabi, “Reliability evaluation of smart microgrids considering cyber failures and disturbances under various cyber network topologies and distributed generation’s scenarios,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 10, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13105695.
17.
M. Gholami, M. Mohammadtaheri, and A. Gholami, “A new approach for reliability assessment of the smart microgrids using k-shortest path algorithms,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab., vol. 0, no. 0, p. 1748006X231214337, doi: 10.1177/1748006X231214337.
18.
M. Aslani, H. Hashemi-Dezaki, and A. Ketabi, “Analytical reliability evaluation method of smart micro-grids considering the cyber failures and information transmission system faults,” IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 2816–2839, 2022, doi: 10.1049/rpg2.12541.
19.
Y. Han, Y. Wen, C. Guo, and H. Huang, “Incorporating cyber layer failures in composite power system reliability evaluations,” Energies, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 9064–9086, 2015, doi: 10.3390/en8099064.
20.
H. Lei, C. Singh, and A. Sprintson, “Reliability modeling and analysis of IEC 61850 based substation protection systems,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 2194–2202, 2014, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2014.2314616.
21.
Y. Xue, M. Li, J. Luo, M. Ni, Q. Chen, and T. Yi, “Modeling Method for Coupling Relations in Cyber Physical Power Systems Based on Correlation Characteristic Matrix,” Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation Electr. Power Syst., vol. 42, pp. 11–19, 2018, doi: 10.7500/AEPS20170705006.
22.
M. Li, M. Ni, Y. Xue, X. Chen, and W. Ding, “Hybrid Calculation Architecture of Cyber Physical Power System Based on Correlative Characteristic Matrix Model,” 8th Annu. IEEE Int. Conf. Cyber Technol. Autom. Control Intell. Syst. CYBER 2018, pp. 584–588, 2019, doi: 10.1109/CYBER.2018.8688204.
23.
A. H. Ahangar and H. A. Abyaneh, “Improvement of smart grid reliability considering various cyber network topologies and direct interdependency,” Asia-Pacific Power Energy Eng. Conf. APPEEC, vol. 2016-Decem, pp. 267–272, 2016, doi: 10.1109/APPEEC.2016.7779510.
24.
M. Kim, Y. Kim, and N. Myoung, “A multi-level hierarchical communication network architecture for distributed generators,” Electr. Eng., vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 303–312, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00202-015-0332-7.
25.
C. Wang, T. Zhang, F. Luo, F. Li, and Y. Liu, “Impacts of Cyber System on Microgrid Operational Reliability,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 105–115, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2732484.
26.
B. Jimada-Ojuolape and J. Teh, “Surveys on the reliability impacts of power system cyber–physical layers,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 62, no. July, p. 102384, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102384.
27.
O. Akinpelumi and K. Kopsidas, “Impact Analysis of Cyber-related Failures on Power System Reliability - A Review,” 2021 IEEE Madrid PowerTech, PowerTech 2021 - Conf. Proc., 2021, doi: 10.1109/PowerTech46648.2021.9495026.
28.
H. J. Jabir, J. Teh, D. Ishak, and H. Abunima, “Impact of demand-side management on the reliability of generation systems,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1–19, 2018, doi: 10.3390/en11082155.
29.
S. Garip, Ş. Özdemir, and N. Altın, “Power system reliability assessment - A review on analysis and evaluation methods,” J. Energy Syst., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 401–419, 2022, doi: 10.30521/jes.1099618.
30.
C. M. Lai and J. Teh, “Comprehensive review of the dynamic thermal rating system for sustainable electrical power systems,” Energy Reports, vol. 8, pp. 3263–3288, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.085.
31.
L. Yang and J. Teh, “Review on vulnerability analysis of power distribution network,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 224, no. May, p. 109741, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109741.
32.
C. M. Lai, J. Teh, B. Alharbi, A. AlKassem, A. Aljabr, and N. Alshammari, “Optimisation of generation unit commitment and network topology with the dynamic thermal rating system considering N-1 reliability,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 221, no. March, p. 109444, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109444.
33.
J. Teh, C. M. Lai, and Y. H. Cheng, “Impact of the real-time thermal loading on the bulk electric system reliability,” IEEE Trans. Reliab., vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1110–1119, 2017, doi: 10.1109/TR.2017.2740158.
34.
B. Jimada-Ojuolape and J. Teh, “Impacts of Communication Network Availability on Synchrophasor-Based DTR and SIPS Reliability,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.1109/jsyst.2021.3122022.
35.
B. Jimada-Ojuolape and J. Teh, “Composite Reliability Impacts of Synchrophasor-Based DTR and SIPS Cyber-Physical Systems,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 3927–3938, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3132657.
36.
P. Nyeng and J. Østergaard, “Information and communications systems for control-by-price of distributed energy resources and flexible demand,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 334–341, 2011, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2011.2116811.
37.
M. Kezunovic, “Monitoring of power system topology in real-time,” Proc. Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., vol. 10, no. C, pp. 1–10, 2006, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2006.355.
38.
X. Liu, P. Wang, and P. C. Loh, “A Hybrid AC/DC Microgrid and Its Coordination Control,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 278–286, 2011, doi: 10.1109/TSG.2011.2116162.
39.
B. Cai et al., “Resilience evaluation methodology of engineering systems with dynamic-Bayesian-network-based degradation and maintenance,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 209, p. 107464, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
40.
B. Cai et al., “Application of Bayesian Networks in Reliability Evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2146–2157, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TII.2018.2858281.
CITATIONS (1):
1.
Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance IV
Mariusz Piechowski, Izabela Kudelska
Mariusz Piechowski, Izabela Kudelska
| eISSN: | 2956-3860 |
| ISSN: | 1507-2711 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
