Search for Author, Title, Keyword
RESEARCH PAPER
Poisson-distributed failures in the predicting of the cost of corrective maintenance
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Poznan University of Technology Faculty of Electrical Engineering Piotrowo 3A, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
 
2
Wrocław University of Science and Technology Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
 
3
Poznan University of Technology Faculty of Machines and Transport Piotrowo 3, 60-965 Poznań, Poland
 
 
Publication date: 2018-12-31
 
 
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2018;20(4):602-609
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Maintaining high efficiency of using the fleet of public mass transport vehicles puts many challenges ahead of the operator. Among them, when planning periodic operational activities, the operator should take into account the assessment of possible unexpected vehicle failures and the costs of their removal under the so-called corrective maintenance. Due to the random nature of vehicle breakdowns, knowledge about stochastic processes is necessary to maintain their efficient and safe operation. The research problem formulated in the title meets these needs. Therefore, the costs of corrective maintenance of vehicles are modelled, i.e. the costs that are not included in the scheduled maintenance costs and are not related to preventive maintenance. The costs of corrective maintenance and the costs of replacement of damaged parts are unexpectedly created at random moments of operating means of transport, usually between scheduled maintenance. Due to the variety of failure processes of individual parts of the vehicle, the methods and applications of stochastic modelling for simple failures modelled by the Poisson process are presented in this paper. The basis for the application of the presented methods is to identify those parts of the vehicle that are damaged in accordance with this process. The assessment of parameters of failure processes of individual vehicle parts is made on the basis of the operational database of a homogeneous fleet of vehicles operated for 5 years. The operational database is dynamically updated with new events. On the basis of actual data on corrective maintenance of a distinguished group of damaged parts of vehicles, the possibilities and limitations of practical applications of the Poisson process to assess the risk of incurring costs in the further process of fleet operation were shown.
 
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Andrzejczak K.: Stochastic modelling of the repairable system, Journal of KONBiN 3(35) 2015, 5-14.
 
2.
Andrzejczak K.: Methods of the forecasting in the modeling of means of transport maintenance (in Polish). Rozprawy nr 496. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej, Poznań 2013.
 
3.
Andrzejczak K., Selech J.: Quantile analysis of the operating costs of public transport fleet, Transport Problems, vol. 12 (3), 103-111, 2017.
 
4.
Andrzejczak K, Selech J., Investigating the trends of average costs of corrective maintenance of public transport vehicles, Journal of KONBiN 41(2017), 207-226. DOI 10.1515jok-2017-0011.
 
5.
Andrzejczak K., Młyńczak M., Selech J. Assessment model of operational effectiveness related to newly operated public means of transport. Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2017), Portorož, Słowenia, Editors: Marko Čepin, Radim Briš, pages 3455-3461.
 
6.
Ascher H., Feingold H.: Repairable Systems Reliability: Modeling, Inference, Misconceptions and their Causes. Marcel Decker, New York, 1984.
 
7.
Bobrowski D.: Modele i metody matematyczne teorii niezawodności w przykładach i zadaniach. 1985, Warszawa, WNT.
 
8.
Chen Y., Cowling P., Polack F., Remde S., Mourdjis P., Dynamic optimisation of preventative and corrective maintenance schedules for a large scale urban drainage system. European Journal of Operational Research, 257 (2), 494-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor....
 
9.
Ferreira L.A., Silva J.L. Parameter estimation for Weibull distribution with right censored data using EM algorithm. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2017; 19(2): 310–315, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein... .
 
10.
Grabski F.: Stochastyczny model bezpieczeństwa obiektu w procesie eksploatacji. Problemy Eksploatacji, 1/2011 (80), 89-102.
 
11.
Grabski F.: Nonhomogenous Poisson proces application to modeling accidents number at Baltic Sea waters and ports, Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars, Vol. 8, Number 1, 2017, 39-46.
 
12.
Jokiel-Rokita A., Magiera R.: (2010). Parameter estimation in non-homogeneous Poisson process models for software reliability. Technical report, Wrocław University of Technology, Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science.
 
13.
Knopik L, Migawa K. Multi-state model of maintenance policy. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2018; 20 (1): 125–130, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein....
 
14.
Kusz A., Marciniak A., Skwarcz J. Implementation of computation process in a bayesian network on the example of unit operating costs determination. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2015; 17 (2): 266–272, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein....
 
15.
Legát V, Mošna F, Aleš Z, Jurča V. Preventive maintenance models – higher operational reliability. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2017; 19 (1): 134–141, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein....
 
16.
Lee H, Cha J H. New stochastic models for preventive maintenance and maintenance optimization. European Journal of Operational Research 2016; 255 (1): 80-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor....
 
17.
Macián V, Tormos B, Riechi J. Time replacement optimization model: comparative analysis of urban transport fleets using Monte Carlo Simulation. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2017; 19 (2): 151–157, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein....
 
18.
Młyńczak M. 2012. Metodyka badań eksploatacyjnych obiektów technicznych, Wrocław, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, s. 204.
 
19.
Nakagawa T.: Stochastic Processes with Applications to Reliability Theory. Springer, 2011.
 
20.
Nataša Kontrec, Stefan Panić, Milena Petrović, Hranislav Milošević. A stochastic model for estimation of repair rate for system operating under performance based logistics. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2018; 20 (1): 68–72, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein....
 
21.
Nowakowski T, Młyńczak M, Werbińska-Wojciechowska S, Dziaduch I, Tubis A. Life Cycle Costs of passenger transportation system. Case study of Wroclaw city agglomeration 5. JPSRA 2014; 5: 109-120.
 
22.
Omdahl T.P., ed.: Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM) Dictionary, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1988.
 
23.
Pogačnik B, Duhovnik J, Tavčar J. Aircraft fault forecasting at maintenance service on the basis of historic data and aircraft parameters. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2017; 19 (4): 624–633, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein....
 
24.
Raposo H, Farinha JT, Ferreira L, Galar D. An integrated econometric model for bus replacement and determination of reserve fleet size based on predictive maintenance. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – Maintenance and Reliability 2017; 19 (3): 358–368, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein....
 
25.
Rymarz J, Niewczas A, Krzyżak A. Comparison of operational availability of public city buses by analysis of variance. Eksploatacja I Niezawodnosc–Maintenance and Reliability 2016; 18 (3):373–378, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein....
 
26.
Sharma A, Yadava G S, Deshmukh S G. A literature review and future perspectives on maintenance optimization, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 2011; 17 (1): 5 – 25, https://doi.org/10.1108/135525....
 
27.
Stenström C, Norrbin P, Parida A, Kumar U. Preventive and corrective maintenance - cost comparison and cost-benefit analysis. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2016; 12 (5): 603-617, https://doi.org/10.1080/157324....
 
 
CITATIONS (25):
1.
 
2.
 
3.
 
4.
 
5.
 
6.
 
7.
 
8.
 
9.
 
10.
 
11.
 
12.
 
13.
 
14.
 
15.
 
16.
 
17.
 
18.
 
19.
 
20.
 
21.
 
22.
 
23.
 
24.
 
25.
 
eISSN:2956-3860
ISSN:1507-2711
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top