RESEARCH PAPER
Parametric Fault Diagnosis Approach for the Power Switching Device of Three-Phase Inverter Utilizing HTISFF-VSPWN
More details
Hide details
1
School of Electrical Engineering, Beijing jiaotong university, China
2
Science and Technology on Reliability Physics and Application of Electronic Component Laboratory, China Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing Research Institute
Guangzhou, China, China
These authors had equal contribution to this work
Submission date: 2024-08-31
Final revision date: 2024-10-17
Acceptance date: 2025-08-25
Online publication date: 2025-09-07
Publication date: 2025-09-07
Corresponding author
Linghui Meng
Science and Technology on Reliability Physics and Application of Electronic Component Laboratory, China Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing Research Institute
Guangzhou, China, China
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2026;28(1):209902
HIGHLIGHTS
- Hilbert transform is used for feature extraction and data dimensionality reduction.
- Multi-scale feature extraction is realized by constructing variable step size volume block.
- Highlight important features through reverse attention mechanism.
- Multiple source features are fused as the final feature tensor.
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The three-phase inverter plays a pivotal role in various fields such as modern industry, rail transit, and aerospace. However, early parametric fault diagnosis of inverter switching devices faces challenges due to redundant feature data and the subtle differences in fault features across different degradation levels. To overcome these issues, we propose a novel method called HTISFF-VSPWN for parametric fault diagnosis. Our approach involves extracting key characteristics from the three-phase voltage and current data of the inverter using the Hilbert transform. Following this, we train the model after dimension reduction. Experimental results conducted on SIC MOSFETs parametric fault data reveal that HTISFF-VSPWN outperforms other methods. Compared to 1DCNN, 1DCNN-LSTM, DRSN, IWOA-1DCNN-LSTM and MTF-SPCNN, our method achieves a diagnostic accuracy improvement of 3.69%, 2.81%, 1.6%, 0.67% and 0.92% respectively. The diagnostic time was reduced by 64s, 106s, 120s, 182s and 99s compared with the comparison method.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Y. Luo, K. D. Li, C. Y. Chen et al., “Model parameter identification-based inverter fault diagnosis method,” Journal of railway science and engineering., vol. 21 no. 5, pp. 2119-2130, May. 2024, doi: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.T20231329.
2.
J. Y. Jeong, S. Kwak, “Investigation of Loss Characteristics in SiC-MOSFET Based Three-Phase Converters Subject to Power Cycling and Short Circuit Aging,” Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 3049-3059, May. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42835-023-01537-5.
3.
M. Aydin, E. Beser, H. Kelebek, “Efficiency comparison of 2-level and 3-level Si IGBT based inverters,” 2023 7th International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA). Singapore, Singapore. IEEE., 2023, pp. 126-130, doi: 10.1109/ICGEA57077.2023.10125768.
4.
B. Lu, S. K. Sharma, “A literature review of IGBT fault diagnostic and protection methods for power inverters,” in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1770-1777, Sept.-oct. 2009, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2009.2027535.
5.
Y. Y. Jiang, H. Cheng, J. Cui, et al., “Soft fault diagnosis of photovoltaic inverter based on VMD wavelet energy,” Proceedings of the CSU-EPSA., vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 19-25, 2018, doi: CNKI: SUN: DLZD.0.2018-11-004.
6.
X. W. Wei, Y. G. Yang, Y. Zhang et al., “Parallel Open-Circuit Fault Diagnosis Method for Cascaded Full-Bridge NPC Inverters with carrier phase shifted modulation,” Proceedings of the CSEE., pp. 1-18, doi: 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.232447.
7.
I. Jlassi, J. O. Estima, S. K. E. Khil et al., “A Robust Observer-Based Method for IGBTs and Current Sensors Fault Diagnosis in Voltage-Source Inverters of PMSM Drives,” in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 2894-2905, May-June 2017, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2016.2616398.
8.
B. Gou, Y. Xu, Y. Xia et al., “An Online Data-Driven Method for Simultaneous Diagnosis of IGBT and Current Sensor Fault of Three-Phase PWM Inverter in Induction Motor Drives,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 13281-13294, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2020.2994351.
9.
Q. Y. Wang, W. P. Li, “Open-Circuit Fault Diagnosis Method for Traction Inverter Based on Average Voltage and Extreme Learning Machine,” China Railway Science., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 143-152, 2023.
10.
Q. Sun, X. H. Yu, H. S Li et al., “Adaptive feature extraction and fault diagnosis for three-phase inverter based on hybrid-CNN models under variable operating conditions,” Complex & Intelligent Systems., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2021, doi: 10.1007/S40747-021-00337-6.
11.
B.Y. Song, Y.Y. Liu, J.Z.Fang, et al. An optimized CNN-BiLSTM network for bearing fault diagnosis under multiple working conditions with limited training samples, Neurocomputing, Vol.574, Jan. 2024.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuc....
12.
Q. Z. Zhao, Y. Li, S. M. Tian et al., “Condition Monitoring and Fault Handling Method Based on Big Data Analysis of Intelligent Distribution Network,” Power System Technology., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 774-780, 2016. doi: 10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2016.03.017.
13.
B. Q. Qian, Q. Chen, Z. W. Zhang et al., “Multi-task Transient Stability Assessment Based on Feature-level Fusion of Heterogeneous Data,” Automation of Electric power System., vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 118-128, 2023.
14.
I. Bandyopadhyay, P. Purkait, C. Koley, “Performance of a Classifier Based on Time-Domain Features for Incipient Fault Detection in Inverter Drives,” in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 3-14, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TII.2018.2854885.
15.
Y. Y. Jiang, S. T. Zhang. “Research on soft fault diagnosis method of PV inverter based on improved VMD and CNN neural network,” Electrical measurement and instrumentation., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 158-163, 2021, doi: 10.19753/j.issn1001-1390.2021.02.025.
16.
Z. Y. Li, Q. Chen, B. Q. Qian, et al., “Health diagnosis of switch tube in grid-connected inverter based on Gramian angular field and parallel CNN,” Electric Power Automation Equipment, pp. 1-11, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.16081/j.epae.202312032.
17.
Y.B. Cui, R.J. Wang, Y.P. Si, et al., “T-type inverter fault diagnosis based on GASF and improved AlexNet,” Energy Reports, Vol.9, pp.2718-2731, Dec. 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr....
18.
Y.Y. Jiang, L. Xia, J. Zhang, A fault feature extraction method for DC-DC Converters Based on Automatic Hyperparameter-Optimized 1-D Convolution and long short-term memory neural networks, IEEE Journal of emerging and selected topics in power electronics, Vol.10, no.4, Aug. 2022.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE....
19.
C.L. Lei, M.X. Jiao, S.Z. Ma, et al. Fault diagnosis method of small sample rolling bearing under variable working conditions based on MTF-SPCNN, Journal of Beijing university of aeronautics and astronautics, pp. 1-15.doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0927.