Search for Author, Title, Keyword
RESEARCH PAPER
Fault diagnosis for complex systems based on reliability analysis and sensors data considering epistemic uncertainty
,
 
Y. Lin 1
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
School of Information Engineering Nanchang University, 999 Xuefu Rd., Honggutan new district Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
 
 
Publication date: 2018-12-31
 
 
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2018;20(4):558-566
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper presents an information fusion method to diagnose system fault based on dynamic fault tree (DFT) analysis and dynamic evidential network (DEN). In the proposed method, firstly, it uses a DFT to describe the dynamic fault characteristics and evaluates the failure rate of components using interval numbers to deal with the epistemic uncertainty. Secondly, qualitative analysis of a DFT is to generate the characteristic function via a traditional zero-suppressed binary decision diagram, while quantitative analysis is to calculate some importance measures by mapping a DFT into a DEN. Thirdly, these reliability results are updated according to sensors data and used to design a novel diagnostic algorithm to optimize system diagnosis. Furthermore, a diagnostic decision tree (DDT) is obtained to guide the maintenance workers to recover the system. Finally, the performance of the proposed method is evaluated by applying it to a train-ground wireless communication system. The results of simulation analysis show the feasibility and effectiveness of this methodology
 
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Assaf T, Dugan J B. Design for diagnosis using a diagnostic evaluation measure. Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine 2006; 9(4): 37-43, https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.20....
 
2.
Assaf T, Dugan J B. Diagnosis based on reliability analysis using monitors and sensors. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2008; 93(4): 509-521, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
3.
Cai B, Liu H, Xie M. A real-time fault diagnosis methodology of complex systems using object-oriented Bayesian networks. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2016; 80: 31-44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymss....
 
4.
Cao Y, Li T, Wang J, Xie R, Wang X. Fuzzy dynamic fault tree analysis for electro-mechanical actuator based on algebraic model with common-cause failures. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences 2016; 50(2): 80-90, https://doi.org/10.3103/S01464....
 
5.
Chen Y, Zhen Z, Yu H, Xu J. Application of Fault Tree Analysis and Fuzzy Neural Networks to Fault Diagnosis in the Internet of Things (IoT) for Aquaculture. Sensors 2017; 17(1): 1-15, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010....
 
6.
Chiremsel Z, Said R N, Chiremsel R. Probabilistic Fault Diagnosis of Safety Instrumented Systems based on Fault Tree Analysis and Bayesian Network. Journal of Failure Analysis & Prevention 2017; 16(5): 747-760, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668....
 
7.
Doguc O, Ramirez-Marquez J E. Using Bayesian approach for sensitivity analysis and fault diagnosis in complex systems. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 2009; 13(1): 33-48.
 
8.
Duan R X, Dong D C, Zhao S M. Information Fusion method for system fault diagnosis based on dynamic fault tree analysis. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science) 2011; 39(11): 1699-1704.
 
9.
Duan R X, Fan J H. A novel diagnosis strategy for braking system of urban rail transit based on fuzzy set and dynamic fault tree. ICIC Express Letters 2014; 8(7): 1809-1814.
 
10.
Duan R X, Zhou H L. Diagnosis strategy for micro-computer controlled straight electro-pneumatic braking system using fuzzy set and dynamic fault tree. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2014; 16(2): 217-223.
 
11.
Duan R X, Hu L F and Lin Y N. Fault diagnosis for complex systems based on dynamic evidential network and multi-attribute decision making with interval numbers. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2017; 19(4): 580-589, https://doi.org/10.17531/ ein.2017.4.12.
 
12.
Huang H Z, Li Y F, Sun J, Yang Y J. Fuzzy Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis for the Solar Array Drive Assembly. Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2013; 49(19): 70-76, https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.20....
 
13.
Hui K H, Lim M H, Leong M S, Al-Obaidi S M. Dempster-Shafer evidence theory for multi-bearing faults diagnosis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2017; 57: 160-170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enga....
 
14.
Jiang C, Zhang Z, Han X and Liu J. A novel evidence-theory-based reliability analysis method for structures with epistemic uncertainty. Computers & Structures 2013; 129: 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
15.
Kabir S, Walker M, Papadopoulos Y, Rüde E, Securius P. Fuzzy temporal fault tree analysis of dynamic systems. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2016; 77: 20-37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar....
 
16.
Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. Risk-based design of process systems using discrete-time Bayesian networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2013; 109: 5-17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
17.
Li Y F, Huang H Z, Liu Y, Xiao N C, Li H Q. A new fault tree analysis method: fuzzy dynamic fault tree analysis. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2012; 14(3): 208-214.
 
18.
Liu Z, Li Y F, He L P, Yang Y Z, Huang H Z. A new fault tree analysis approach based on imprecise reliability model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 2014; 228(4): 371-381, https://doi.org/10.1177/174800....
 
19.
Mi J, Li Y ., Yang Y J, Peng W, Huang H Z. Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2016; 152: 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
20.
Philippe W, Christophe S. Dynamic evidential networks in system reliability analysis: A Dempster-Shafer Approach. Proceedings of the 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation, Ajaccio, France 2008; 603-608.
 
21.
Şahin R, Liu P. Possibility-induced simplified neutrosophic aggregation operators and their application to multi-criteria group decision-making. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2017; 29(4): 769-785, https://doi.org/10.1080/095281....
 
22.
Sun H L, Yao W X. Comments on methods for ranking interval numbers. Journal of Systems Engineering 2010; 25(3): 18-26.
 
23.
Tao J Y, Dong D C. An improved method for system fault diagnosis using fault tree analysis. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology 2010; 42(1): 143-147.
 
24.
Tang Z, Dugan J B. Minimal cut set / sequence generation for dynamic fault trees. Proceedings of Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2004; 207-213.
 
25.
Wang D, Zhang Y, Jia X, Jiang P, Guo B. Handling Uncertainties in Fault Tree Analysis by a Hybrid Probabilistic-Possibilistic Framework. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2016; 32(3): 1137-1148, https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.18....
 
26.
Yuge T, Yanagi S. Dynamic fault tree analysis using Bayesian networks and sequence probabilities. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences 2013; 96(5): 953-962, https://doi.org/10.1587/transf....
 
27.
Zhang R, Zhang L, Wang N, Wang W. Reliability evaluation of a multi-state system based on interval-valued triangular fuzzy Bayesian networks. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 2016: 7(1), 16-24, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198....
 
28.
Zhang X, Mahadevan S, Deng X. Reliability analysis with linguistic data: An evidential network approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2017; 162: 111-121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress....
 
 
CITATIONS (14):
1.
 
2.
 
3.
 
4.
 
5.
 
6.
 
7.
 
8.
 
9.
 
10.
 
11.
 
12.
 
13.
 
14.
 
eISSN:2956-3860
ISSN:1507-2711
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top