RESEARCH PAPER
Effect of temperature variation on repeatability positioning of a robot when assembling parts with cylindrical surfaces
| 1 | Department of Manufacturing and Production Engineering Rzeszow University of Technology al. Powstańców Warszawy 8, 35-959 Rzeszów, Polska |
| 2 | Department of Materials Forming and Processing Rzeszow University of Technology al. Powstańców Warszawy 8, 35-959 Rzeszów, Polska |
Publication date: 2018-12-31
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2018;20(4):503–513
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In this paper, the effect of the errors induced by temperature changes on the repeatability positioning error of an industrial robot
is analysed. It has been shown that after the stabilization of the thermal conditions, these errors can be identified with the systematic errors. It has also been shown that if the ambient temperature cannot be sufficiently stabilized, the temperature errors can be
described using a normal or uniform probability distribution. Depending on the choice of a point in the robot’s workspace and
temperature fluctuations, these errors can comprise a small share of the total error of the robot. Then the total repeatability positioning error can be approximated with sufficient accuracy by a normal probability distribution or it can comprise the dominant
component of this error. In this case, the total error can be approximated using a flat normal distribution. It has been shown that,
depending on the choice of location in the workspace in which the assembly operation is carried out, it is possible to obtain both
different probabilities of assembling the parts correctly and a different effect of errors caused by slight temperature changes on
the value of those probabilities. The results found indicate the potential possibility of increasing the reliability of the process by
proposing the selection of the location in the robot workspace which has the lowest sensitivity to errors ascribed to changes in
temperature
REFERENCES (33)
1.
Abderrahim M, Khamis A, Garrido S, Moreno L. Accuracy and Calibration Issues of Industrial Manipulators. [in:] Hua L K. Industrial Robotics- Programming, Simulation and Applications. ARS/plV: Germany, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5772/4895.
2.
Angelidis A, Vosniakos G C. Prediction and compensation of relative position error along industrial robot end-effector paths. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing 2014; 15(1): 63-73, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541....
3.
Brethé J F, Vasselin E, Lefebvre D, Dakyo B. Modeling of repeatability phenomena using the stochastic ellipsoid approach. Robotica 2006; 24(4): 477-490, https://doi.org/10.1017/S02635....
4.
Chen H, Fuhlbrigge T, Choi S, Wang J, Li X. Practical industrial robot zero offset calibration, Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering; 2008 Aug 23-26; Washington; 2008: 516-521.
5.
Cho N, Tu J F. Quantitative circularity tolerance analysis and design for 2D precision assemblies. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2002: 42(13): 1391-1401, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-....
6.
Craig J J. Introduction to robotics: Mechanics and control. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1989.
7.
Du G., Zhang P. Online robot calibration based on vision measurement. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2013; 29 (1): 484-492, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim....
8.
Eastwood S, Webb P. Compensation of thermal deformation of a hybrid parallel kinematic machine. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2009; 25(1): 81-90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim....
9.
Elatta A, Gen L P, Zhi F L, Daoyuan Y, Fei L. An overview of robot calibration. Information Technology Journal 2004; 3(1): 74-68, https://doi.org/10.3923/itj.20....
10.
EN ISO 9283:2003, Manipulating industrial robots - Performance criteria and related test methods. Geneva: International Standards Organization, 2003.
11.
Fotowicz P. Systematic effect as a part of the coverage material. Metrology and Measurement Systems 2010; 17(3): 439-446, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10178....
12.
Gong C, Yuan J, Ni J. Nongeometric error identification and compensation for robotic system by inverse calibration. International Journal of Machine Tools Manufacturing 2000; 40(14): 2119-2137, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-....
13.
Gürsel A, Bijan S. A systematic technique to estimate positioning errors for robot accuracy improvement using laser interferometry based sensing. Mechanism and Machine Theory 2005; 40 (8): 879-906, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mech....
14.
Hameed Farhan U, Tolouei-Rad M, Osseiran A. Assembly modelling approach for special purpose machines. Assembly Automation 2018; 38 (2):158-172, https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-12-....
15.
Heisel U, Richter F, Wurst K H. Thermal behaviour of industrial robots and possibilities for error compensation. CIRP Annals 1997; 46(1): 283-286, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-....
16.
Józwik J, Ostrowski D, Jarosz P, Mika D. Industrial robot repeatability testing with high speed camera Phantom. v2511. Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal, 2016; 10(32): 86-96.
17.
Kluz R, Trzepieciński T. The repeatability positioning analysis of the industrial robot arm. Assembly Automation 2014; 34(3): 285-295, https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-07-....
18.
Kluz R, Trzepieciński T. Analysis of optimal orientation of robot gripper for an improved capability assembly process. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2015; 74: 253-266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robo....
19.
Kluz R. Effect of temperature-induced errors on accuracy of robotised assembly stand with Mitsubishi RV-2 robot. Technology and Automation Assembly 2004; 2: 19-24.
20.
Li R, Zhao Y. Dynamic error compensation for industrial robot based on thermal effect model. Measurement 2016; 88: 113-120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meas....
21.
Nguyen H N, Zhou J, Kang H J. A new full pose measurement method for robot calibration. Sensors 2013; 13(7): 9132-9147, https://doi.org/10.3390/s13070....
22.
Pitchandi N, Perumaal S S, Irulappan M. Insertion force analysis of compliantly supported peg-in-hole assembly. Assembly Automation 2017; 37 (3): 285-295, https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-12-....
23.
Płaczek M, Piszczek Ł. Testing of an industrial robot's accuracy and repeatability in off and online environment. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2018; 20 (3): 455-464, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
24.
Ramesh R, Mannan M A, Poo A N. Error compensation in machine tools - a review: Part II: Thermal errors. International Journal of Machine Tools Manufacturing 2000; 40(9): 1257-1284, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-....
26.
Shapiro S S, Wilk M B. An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 1965; 52(3/4): 591-611, https://doi.org/10.2307/233370....
27.
Shiakolas P S, Conrad K L, Yih T C. On the accuracy, repeatability and degree of influence of kinematics parameters for industrial robots. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation 2002; 22(4): 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1080/022862....
28.
Slamani M, Nubiola A, Bonev I. Assessment of the positioning performance of an industrial robot. Industrial robot: An International Journal, 2012; 39(1): 57-68, https://doi.org/10.1108/014399....
29.
Wu Y, Klimchik A, Caro S, Furet B, Pashkevich A. Geometric calibration of industrial robots using enhanced partial pose measurements and design of experiments. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 2015; 35: 151-168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim....
30.
Yin S, Guo Y, Ren Y, Zhu J, Yang S, Ye S. Real-time thermal error compensation method for robotic visual inspection system. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2014; 75(5-8): 933-946, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170....
31.
Yu H, Zhang G, Ran Y, Li M, Wang Y. A comprehensive and practical reliability allocation method considering failure effects and reliability costs. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability 2018; 20(2): 244-251, https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
32.
Yu Z, Shi Q, Wang H, Yu N, Huang Q, Fukuda T. How to achieve precise operation of a robotic manipulator on a macro to micro/nano scale. Assembly Automation 2017; 37 (2):186-199, https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-02-....
33.
Zhenhua W, Hui X, Guodong C, Rongchuan S, Sun L. A distance error based industrial robot kinematic calibration method. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2014; 41(5): 439-446, https://doi.org/10.1108/IR-04-....
CITATIONS (3):
1.
Influence of Drift on Robot Repeatability and Its Compensation
Michal Vocetka, Zdenko Bobovský, Jan Babjak, Jiří Suder, Stefan Grushko, Jakub Mlotek, Václav Krys, Martin Hagara
Applied Sciences
Michal Vocetka, Zdenko Bobovský, Jan Babjak, Jiří Suder, Stefan Grushko, Jakub Mlotek, Václav Krys, Martin Hagara
Applied Sciences
2.
A calibration-based method for interval reliability analysis of the multi-manipulator system
Wei Wang, Shuangyao Liu, Jin Wang, Guodong Lu
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability
Wei Wang, Shuangyao Liu, Jin Wang, Guodong Lu
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability
3.
Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics
Michal Vocetka, Dominik Heczko, Jan Babjak, Zdenko Bobovský, Václav Krys, Roman Ružarovský, Robert Bočák
Michal Vocetka, Dominik Heczko, Jan Babjak, Zdenko Bobovský, Václav Krys, Roman Ružarovský, Robert Bočák
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.