Search for Author, Title, Keyword
A method for assessing of ship fuel system failures resulting from fuel changeover imposed by environmental requirements
More details
Hide details
Maritime University of Szczecin, Mechanical Engineering Department, ul. Willowa 2, 71-650 Szczecin, Poland
Publication date: 2021-12-31
Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability 2021;23(4):619–626
  • Low sulfur fuels Quantitative and qualitative failure analysis was performed.
  • Two markers were proposed for the quantitative assessment of failure frequency.
  • Qualitative assessment was done by the adoption of three failure severity levels.
Environmental regulations instigated the technological and procedural revolution in shipping. One of the challenges has been sulfur emission control areas (SECA) and requirement of fuel changeover. Initially, many reports anticipated that new grades of low sulfur fuels might increase various technical problems in ship operation. This research develops a simple and easy to use method of the failure severity and intensity assessment in relation to fuel changeover. The scale of failure rate in the ship’s fuel system was evaluated qualitatively and quantitively, using developed failure frequency indicator and the time between failure. Based on 77 records of fuel system failures collected on seven ships, it has been found that frequency of failures related to SECA fuel changeover is on average nearly three times higher compared to the rest of sailing time. Their severity did not significantly change, but the structure of failures changed considerably. The method and presented results may help in improvement of ship’s systems design and on-board operational procedures.
Alfa Laval. Alfa Laval - Marine fuels in the low-sulphur era. Lund 2018. [].
American Bureau of Shipping. Fuel Switching Advisory. Houston 2015. [].
Anh Tran T. Some Methods to Prevent the Wear of Piston-Cylinder When Using Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (LSFO) for All Ships Sailing on Emission Control Areas (ECAs). Diesel and Gasoline Engines, 2020.
Antturi J, Hänninen O, Jalkanen J P et al. Costs and benefits of low-sulphur fuel standard for Baltic Sea shipping. Journal of Environmental Management 2016; 184: 431–440,
Bejger A, Drzewieniecki J. Analysis of tribological processes occuring in precision pairs based on example of fuel injection pumps of marine diesel engines. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin 2015; nr 41(113): 9–16.
Borkowski T, John A. State of Play and Future needs for Clean Shipping. Szczecin and Rostock, 2021. [].
Chen H, Moan T. Collision Risk Analysis of FPSO-Tanker Offloading Operation. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 2002; 2: 101–112,
Chu Van T, Ramirez J, Rainey T et al. Global impacts of recent IMO regulations on marine fuel oil refining processes and ship emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2019; 70: 123–134,
Chybowski L, Gawdzińska K, Laskowski R. Assessing the unreliability of systems during the early operation period of a ship-A case study. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2019;
Czermański E, Droździecki S, Matczak M et al. Sulphur Regulation-Technology Solutions and Economic Consequences for the Baltic Sea Region Shipping Market. Institute of Maritime Transport and Seaborne Trade University of Gdańsk: 2014 .
Department of Natural Resources Mines and Energy. Guidelines for Failure Impact Assessment of Water Dams. 2018. [https://www.dews.].
DNV-GL. Technical Uupdate - Preparing For Low Sulphur Operations. Hamburg 2014. [].
ECSA. Overview of ‘fuel changeover’ issues and challenges as they affect ECA SOx compliance. 2014. [].
European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA). Sulphur Inspection Guidance Directive (EU) 2016/802. 2019. [].
European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA). The 0.1% sulphur in fuel requirement as from 1 January 2015 in SECAs. 2010. [].
Fan L, Gu B. Impacts of the increasingly strict sulfur limit on compliance option choices: The case study of Chinese SECA. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2020;
Ian Crutchley. Adjusting to change. Bunkerspot 2016; 68–70. [].
IMO. International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships. International Maritime Organization; 2017.
Intership Navigation. Circular Tech#07-Procedures of Implementing MARPOL An. VI. Circular Letters: 2014.
Kaidis C, Uzunoglu B, Amoiralis F. Wind turbine reliability estimation for different assemblies and failure severity categories. IET Renewable Power Generation 2015; 9(8): 892–899,
Kamiński W, Krause P, Gumiński D, Rajewski P. The quality of marine fuels and the safety of navigation: case studies. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin 2016; 48(120): 15–21,
Kołodziejski M. Failure finding tasks in Reliability Centred Maintenance. Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin 2011; 28(100):53–59.
Krystosik-Gromadzińska A. Ship exploitation and rules connected with sulphur limits restrictions. Scientific Journals Maritime University of Szczecin 2011; 28(100): 73–77.
Li F, Dang K. Ship’s Emission Standards on Fuel Changeover in ECAs (SECAs). In 3rd International Conference on Electromechanical Control Technology and Transportation - ICECTT, Chongqing: 2018. 347–350,
MAN Diesel & Turbo. Service Letter SL2014-587 / JAP. 2014. [].
MAN Diesel & Turbo. Service Letter SL2014-593/DOJA - Guidelines for Operation on Fuels with less than 0.1% Sulphur. 2014. [].
MAN Diesel & Turbo. Service Letter SL2018-659/JAP - Cermet-Coated Piston Rings for Operation on Low-Sulphur Fuels. 2018. [].
MAN Diesel & Turbo. Service Letter SL2020-692/KAMO - LDCL cooling system update. 2020. [].
MAN Diesel & Turbo. Waste Heat Recovery System (WHRS) for Reduction of Fuel Consumption, Emissions and EEDI. 2014. [].
Morais C S, Pimenta R E, Ferreira P L et al. Assessing Diabetes Health Literacy, Knowledge and Empowerment in Northern Portugal.Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 2015; vol 354: 63–71,
Olaniyi E O, Viirmäe M. The Economic Impact of Environmental Regulations on a Maritime Fuel Production Company. Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe 2016; 8(2): 58–84, [ viewFile/93/77].
Rausand M, Høyland A. System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications. John Wiley and Sons Ltd: 2009. [].
Sasmito H. E. U B. Analisa Keandalan Sistem Bahan Bakar Motor Induk Pada Km. Leuser. Kapal 2008; 5(3): 123–135,
Shell Marine. IMO 2020 READY. 2019. [].
Spinato F, Tavner P J, Van Bussel G J W, Koutoulakos E. Reliability of wind turbine subassemblies. IET Renewable Power Generation 2009;3(4): 387–401,
Wiratama B Y, Nugroho T F, Busse W. Calculation of Temperature Gradient in Manual Fuel Change-Over Operation. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2018; vol. 874: 81–87
Witherby Publishing Group. Website. Shipping Regulations and Guidance/Reference/Accident Reports. 2021. [].
Zasadzień M. An analysis of the failure frequency of machines in an enterprise characterised by a changeable production level. Zeszyty Naukowe / Akademia Morska w Szczecinie 2013; nr 34(106): 103–107.
Study of the Relationship between the Level of Lubricating Oil Contamination with Distillation Fuel and the Risk of Explosion in the Crankcase of a Marine Trunk Type Engine
Leszek Chybowski
Analysis of the Relationship between Selected ship and Propulsion System Characteristics and the Risk of Main Engine Turbocharger Explosion
Leszek Chybowski, Andrzej Jakubowski, Sławomir Żółkiewski
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering